collegerankings

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Saturday, October 20, 2012

Frontiers of industrial relations

Posted on 4:05 PM by Unknown
"Ocularcentric Labour: 'You Don’t Do this for Money'" 
Relations Industrielles/Industrial Relations, Vol. 67, No. 3, 2012

JENNIFER SAPPEY, Charles Sturt University
Email: jsappey@csu.edu.au
GLENDA MACONACHIE, Queensland University of Technology - School of Management
Email: g.maconachie@qut.edu.au

This article is a response to Lansbury’s call (2009) in this journal for a reconceptualization of work and employment. It supports Lansbury’s belief that the employment relationship cannot be understood in isolation from wider social change. Building on the tradition of emotional labour and aesthetic labour, this study introduces theoretically and empirically the concept of “ocularcentric labour” (the worker seeking the adoring gaze of the client as the primary employment reward). This paper seeks to establish: the empirical generalizability of ocularcentric labour; its conceptual differentiation with aesthetic and emotional labour; and the implications of ocularcentric labour for industrial relations and collective interest representation. Through a study of the employment relationship in the commercial health and fitness industry in Queensland (Australia), we identify this new type of labour as one in which the worker’s primary goal is to seek the psycho-social rewards gained from exposing their own body image. This quest shapes the employment relationship (both the organization of work and the conditions of employment). We argue that for many fitness workers the goal is to gain access to the positional economy of the fitness centre to promote their celebrity. For this they are willing to trade-off standard conditions of employment and direct earnings, and exchange traditional employment rewards for the more intrinsic psycho-social rewards gained through the exposure of their physical capital to the adoration of their gazing clients. As one worker said “You don’t do this for money.” Significantly, with ocularcentric labour the worker becomes both the site of production and consumption.The study draws on quantitative and qualitative data captured from the Australian health and fitness industry with one snapshot taken in 1993 and another in 2008. The conclusion draws together the key conceptual and empirical points and findings and examines the implications for the conceptualization of IR in the contemporary economy.

Hat tip: Charlie Brown
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Posted in | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • Michigan 28, Akron 24
    Dodging a bullet does not even begin to describe this near debacle, with Akron having shots into the end zone on the final four plays! Local...
  • Book: Paying for the Party by Armstrong and Hamilton
    Armstrong, Elizabeth and Laura Hamilton. 2013. Paying for the Party: How College Maintains Inequality . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University P...
  • Assorted links
    1. Rob Mercer on tradition . Why does Canada produce so many good comedians? One suspects it has something to do with living next door to th...
  • In praise of payday lenders
    From the Atlantic, something I never thought I would see: a thoughtful, empirically grounded defense of payday lenders and other alternati...
  • Movie: Jack the Giant Slayer
    Jack the Giant Slayer is, of course, a movie version of the Jack and the Beanstalk story. I pretty much agree with the NYT reviewer down th...
  • Assorted links
    1. Drunken island monkeys . 2. Free speech versus occupational licensing in Kentucky. 3. Virginia Postrel on how to save Barnes and Noble ....
  • Cheaters welcome at Harvard
    This survey of the incoming class , reported in the Harvard Crimson, is a bit troubling. Of course, this is what folks at Chicago suspected ...
  • Assorted links
    1. The goose man . 2. When the mistress of the dead boss sues the company that fired her after he died .  Good stuff. 3. Why I am not a Re...
  • Assorted links
    1. On the history of German restaurants in Ann Arbor. Mainly because it is not within walking distance of campus, I have yet to make it to ...
  • Assorted links
    1. Michigan dorm cafeterias drop their trays . Does this count as an application of behavioral economics? 2. Seattle Public Library breaks ...

Blog Archive

  • ►  2013 (257)
    • ►  September (18)
    • ►  August (34)
    • ►  July (58)
    • ►  June (4)
    • ►  May (16)
    • ►  April (25)
    • ►  March (35)
    • ►  February (41)
    • ►  January (26)
  • ▼  2012 (243)
    • ►  December (47)
    • ►  November (30)
    • ▼  October (28)
      • On Halloween costumes
      • A reinterpretation of the Mayan calendar
      • Ayn Rand on Michigan Television
      • Job market run-up home run
      • Arizona 52, Washington 17
      • Michigan 12, Michigan State 10
      • The satanic video
      • The sweaty joy of housework
      • You didn't build that .....
      • Frontiers of industrial relations
      • Assorted links
      • Where shall we meet?
      • Who says innovation is dead?
      • $500 bills laying around in health care
      • Nobel predictions
      • Movie: Butter
      • Euro movie short
      • Clear evidence of my failure as a parent
      • The Big 5-0
      • Michigan 44, Purdue 13
      • Quacking felons 52, Washington 21
      • I pledge allegiance ... not
      • Suppressing competition in education
      • The secret lives of Maine politicians
      • SNL: Shimmer
      • Economics Moment of Zen #6
      • MacArthur Fellows
      • A most excellent pun
    • ►  September (45)
    • ►  August (73)
    • ►  July (20)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile